[ GUIDE / 11 MIN READ ]

    AI agent orchestration: a production guide.

    By Alex Cinovoj, Founder & CTO, TechTide AI. 13 years of mixed IT, last 2 focused on AI implementation.

    Single-agent loops solve a narrow class of problems. Real production workflows need orchestration: one agent that plans, others that execute, a supervisor that catches failure, and a runbook that tells humans when to step in. This is the field guide to the four orchestration patterns we use, and the ones we've stopped using.

    Pattern 1: Orchestrator-worker

    One orchestrator agent decomposes the task and dispatches subtasks to worker agents. Each worker has a narrow tool set and a narrow context window. Results stream back to the orchestrator for synthesis.

    Ships well for: document processing, multi-source research, code refactors across many files.

    Fails when: subtasks depend on each other in non-obvious ways. The orchestrator can't see the cross-cut.

    Pattern 2: Planner-executor (deliberative)

    A planner agent writes a step-by-step plan in structured output. An executor agent reads the plan and runs each step, with a critic agent reviewing results between steps. The plan is mutable: the critic can send the executor back for a revision.

    Ships well for: long-running engineering tasks, multi-step API automations, anything where reasoning quality matters more than latency.

    Fails when: the planner over-commits to an early plan and the critic doesn't catch the drift. Mitigation: make plans cheap to throw away.

    Pattern 3: Swarm (parallel exploration)

    N agents run the same task in parallel with different prompts, models, or temperatures. A judge agent picks the winner. Expensive but high-quality on tasks with a clear quality signal.

    Ships well for: code generation with test-based scoring, content generation with rubric-based judging, search with hybrid ranking.

    Fails when: the judge model is the bottleneck on quality. Bad judge = expensive averaging machine.

    Pattern 4: Supervised handoff (human-in-the-loop)

    The agent runs autonomously until it hits a confidence floor or a side-effect threshold, then queues for human review. Human approves, edits, or rejects. The handoff is logged and feeds back into the eval suite.

    Ships well for: regulated workflows (finance, healthcare), customer-facing communications, anything with reversal cost.

    Fails when: the queue becomes the bottleneck and humans rubber-stamp without reading. Mitigation: random sampling for quality control.

    Patterns we've stopped using

    • Fully autonomous open-ended loops. The "give the agent a goal and let it run" pattern from 2024. Cost-explodes, hallucinates plans, no audit trail. Replaced by planner-executor with a step cap.
    • Agent-as-tool inside another agent. Looks elegant, debugging is brutal. Replaced by explicit orchestrator-worker boundaries.

    Production essentials, regardless of pattern

    • Step cap. Every agent loop has a hard step ceiling. No exceptions.
    • Cost cap. Per-run token ceiling. Cheap-model fallback on context overflow.
    • Audit log. Every step, every tool call, every model response logged with prompt, output, cost, latency.
    • Eval suite. Regression suite that runs in CI. Catches drift before users do.
    • Kill switch. A flag your on-call can flip to stop all agent traffic without a deploy.
    • Reviewer queue. Side-effect tools route through a human queue at minimum until the eval suite has caught two months of drift.

    Where to start

    Pick the smallest pattern that solves your job. Orchestrator-worker for most document and research jobs. Planner-executor for engineering. Swarm only when you have a clean quality signal. Supervised handoff for anything reversible-expensive. If you have a stuck multi-agent system, the $1,000 AI Audit will tell you in 48 hours whether the pattern is wrong or the implementation is.

    Frequently asked

    What's the difference between AI agents and agentic AI?+

    AI agents are individual loop-and-tool-use programs. Agentic AI is the broader category of systems that decompose tasks across multiple agents with planning, memory, and supervised handoff. See our full breakdown at /ai-agents-vs-agentic-ai.

    Do we need a framework like LangGraph or CrewAI?+

    Sometimes. Frameworks accelerate the first prototype and slow down production debugging. We've shipped production agent systems both with frameworks (LangGraph) and without (TypeScript + Claude SDK). Pick the one your team can debug at 2am.

    How many agents should a workflow have?+

    The minimum that solves the job. Most stuck multi-agent systems have too many agents, not too few. One orchestrator, two workers, one critic is enough for 80% of jobs.

    What about MCP in agent orchestration?+

    MCP is the tool layer, not the orchestration layer. Each worker agent gets a scoped MCP server with its narrow tool set. See /what-is-mcp for the protocol primer.

    Stuck on AI? Start with the $1,000 AI Audit.

    48 hours. Clear go/no-go on whether your pilot ships. Run by Alex Cinovoj directly.